Turnkey, that vacancy period when a rental property is being
renovated or prepped for marketing, creates a potentially perilous situation
for property managers. Indeed, depending on the terms of the management
agreement, it could be a no-man's-land, rife with proverbial, booby-trapped
landmines that could indiscriminately explode without notice.
Commonly, management agreements technically terminate when
the tenant moves out, but if the property owner wishes to continue working with
the property manager, there can be an unstated commitment to renew the leasing
and management agreement once the property is ready for marketing. And it
almost goes without saying that the property manager will assist the property
owner with minor repair work. If the work is to be substantial, as might be
classified as "turnkey", the property manager may want to enter into
a special compensation agreement for arranging and supervising the process.
But what happens if the owner assumes the manager is doing
the turnkey while the manager assumes the owner is handling the process.
Nothing will get done, and at some point, fingers will be pointed. And the
unsolvable argument will begin (landmine).
Often overlooked by owners is the key role they play in the
process, regardless of the written or assumed turnkey agreement. The owner, by
necessity, must be the force behind the project. This only makes sense when one
considers who has the most to gain or lose. In any case, the managers' hands
are tied, unless they have been given a power of attorney to spend the owner's
money, from a funded account. This is rare, so in most cases, it becomes an act
of teamwork with the owner taking lead. But it is essential that the manager
clearly explain and define this role early in the process to avoid
misunderstandings.
Another potential problem is when the owner is unresponsive
to the manager's requests for input, decisions, or funding. The question
becomes: How persistent should the property manager become in pursuing the
property owner? At what point does the property manager cross the line between
better discretion and pestering? At what point does the property manager's
unintended prying become personal? For example, if the owner has no money, and
is embarrassed about it, and if the manager relentlessly pursues the funding,
at some point the property owner is going to become exasperated, firing back at
the manager (landmine). Conversely, what if the property owner really does need
and welcomes the nudging, but the manager backs off in deference to the
property owner. The manager may later be accused of not being aggressive enough
(landmine). At its best or worst, it's a balancing act-and one of the more
frustrating experiences for both parties to the circumstance.
Property managers must talk about this relationship early in
the process. Only then will the property owner understand what's at stake when
he starts receiving desperate emails or phone messages from the property
manager, pleading for needed decisions or resources. This is why it is vital
that property owner understands who has the lead. It's the best way to disarm
the landmines.
Dan Wilhelm ABR, ABRM, CRB, RMP, EcoBroker®
For management or real estate investment help in the Atlanta
Metro area, visit our web site at http://www.3OptionsRealty.com/atlanta-property-management
or call us at (678) 397-1282.
NOTE: Dan is a professional Property Manager operating in
the Atlanta market as well as an investor owning homes in many cities in
Georgia including Marietta, Woodstock, Lawrenceville, Alpharetta, Roswell,
Johns Creek, and Cumming Georgia.
No comments:
Post a Comment